Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, but only to lower the prices.
@7H4YNFJ2yrs2Y
No except in cases of drugs developed using federal funding, as research and development cost concerns do not apply.
@8YX4K8N2yrs2Y
Yes, and eliminate patents for life-saving drugs
@58XQLS82yrs2Y
Yes, but only for drugs funded by the government via grants and research from public universities.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but support people who do not have money to buy it.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but support people who do not have enough money.
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but support people who don't have money
@8ZH98TQ2yrs2Y
Life saving drugs should be more affordable and accesible
Deleted2yrs2Y
No, but allow the government to negotiate drug prices for medicare
@jasonandrewdevine2yrs2Y
No, Government should not be involved in Healthcare
@ThomasJj882yrs2Y
Life saving drugs should be free of charge.
@8TKFNNS2yrs2Y
Yes Only for those that are approved by the people of the United States Of America to save lives
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs. But funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, only to lower the prices
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of life-saving drugs should be made available.
@thomasjj02yrs2Y
Only to lower said price.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of prescription drugs should be made available.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low-income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available.
@8XNT9ZQ2yrs2Y
Yes, the FDA should have cost justification - allow for profit but not usurious prices (i.e. the EpiPen).
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone, but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, its costs should be decreased to make them affordable for everyone but funds for additional research and development of live-saving drugs should be made available. It should only be implemented if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.
Deleted2yrs2Y
Yes, to decrease costs but not by regulating it. It should be implemented only if when the prices of drugs are getting out of hand and a majority of low income people aren't able to afford these drugs.
@tomjolly662yrs2Y
Yes, only to lower the prices.
@8X26N7C3yrs3Y
Yes, But only for life saving or highly required Drugs, anything else needs to be the same or research could decrease from lack of funding.
@Tjolly993yrs3Y
Yes, only to lower them.
@8WP5BCC3yrs3Y
Personally I think the drugs they give to us are made for us to get addicted so should we have a price on drugs that's saving a person's life no we shouldn't but also once that medicine helps the person live watch them get addicted.
@4JS2W3C3yrs3Y
No, but the government should have its own drug manufacturing company that produces drugs at more affordable prices.
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs, but require pharmaceutical companies to provide free or discounted life-saving drugs for low-income patients.
Deleted3yrs3Y
No, limiting drug prices would also limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs. However, require pharmaceutical companies to provide free or discounted life-saving drugs for low-income patients.
@8W7666S3yrs3Y
For some drugs like insulin or epipen
@62GNGKW3yrs3Y
No, the government should break up the pharma monopolies
@7S68PW73yrs3Y
Change patent laws. Make patents for such things a right to royalty rather than monopoly.
@8VCYWFG3yrs3Y
yes some of them are supper expencive and need to be brought down
Deleted3yrs3Y
Yes, only to lower the price.
@8TF44GJ3yrs3Y
No, but abolish medical and scientific patents, and allow citizens to imports drugs and services from abroad, in addition life saving drugs should be covered by the nations public healthcare plan.
@8RBQDDP3yrs3Y
Yes, as long as we don’t limit the investment in research and development into new life-saving drugs
@6Y5KGYR3yrs3Y
The government should subsidize research and development of life-saving drugs to reduce the price.
@8T67P4N3yrs3Y
Regardless, make the drugs more affordable.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Drug prices should be lower
@77QDMZN3yrs3Y
At most, the government should only be allowed to set a price ceiling for life-saving drugs.
@8SM8NFN3yrs3Y
Yes. Insulin should not be $300
@8S9YYND3yrs3Y
No, this should be done at a state and local level
@IINXMP3yrs3Y
Yes, but only if it's for medicare.
Deleted3yrs3Y
Only to lower the prices
@Maxx485038003yrs3Y
No, we should go to a single payer system so all the publicly funded labs can license their IP to privately owned manufactures
@8RSRZ2H3yrs3Y
No, there are many families who end up needing these drugs and cannot pay for them because the price is too high.